<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Else Wants to Rehash Trite, Formulaic Headlines?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unintuitive.net/2007/09/17/who-else-wants-to-rehash-trite-formulaic-headlines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unintuitive.net/2007/09/17/who-else-wants-to-rehash-trite-formulaic-headlines/</link>
	<description>not what you expect</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Light, Motion and Magic &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Headline Fun</title>
		<link>http://unintuitive.net/2007/09/17/who-else-wants-to-rehash-trite-formulaic-headlines/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>Light, Motion and Magic &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Headline Fun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unintuitive.net/2007/09/17/who-else-wants-to-rehash-trite-formulaic-headlines/#comment-380</guid>
		<description>[...] did you know that headlines was a topic worthy of controversy? It is! Read this rant from 2007 Who else wants to rehash trite, formulaic headlines? I guess Copyblogger has been coming up with these headlines for some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] did you know that headlines was a topic worthy of controversy? It is! Read this rant from 2007 Who else wants to rehash trite, formulaic headlines? I guess Copyblogger has been coming up with these headlines for some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
